TRACK RECORD
TJSB calls upon the extensive knowledge
and experience of its operational staff and the utilisation of the latest
computer-based O&M tools and methodologies to optimise the operation and maintenance
of the plants it operates. Innogy PLC, one of UK’s leading energy companies,
conducted an independent Engineering and Operational Risk Assessment
(ERAP-OpRAP) at Lumut Power Plant on May 5-9, 2003. The engineering risk
assessment identified the major engineering and safety risks at LPP and
provided a benchmark against other CCGT plant, taken from a database of
over 40 (forty) assessments made world-wide. Innogy’s engineering risk assessment (ERAP) concluded
that “LPP compares favourably on total mean risk scores, calculated by
summing and averaging scores from all comparable areas of concern on
CCGT plant assessed by Innogy, which reflects a well run power station
with a good level of engineering in general across all plant areas.”
The assessment also concluded that LPP’s overall level of safety and
repair cost risks are “lower than mean average for all the CCGT plants
assessed by Innogy.” In terms of availability risk, Innogy reported
that LPP’s mean average is similar to the mean average for all CCGT
plants assessed by Innogy.” On the other hand, the operational risk assessment process
(OpRAP) identified concerns involving the knowledge/experience of
operational personnel. “Although originally provided with experienced
personnel, this has been reduced as a consequence of the movement of
staff to support Block 3 (GB3), but it identifies a weakness in the
depth of knowledge among the staff in post. This is being dealt with
through training and development programmes implemented at site and,
provided that the necessary components are addressed, the knowledge gap
should be resolved.” The ERAP-OpRAP concluded that “in general TJSB are
carrying out the operation and maintenance of Lumut Power Plant to a
high standard. Quality Management is seen as an essential component in
delivering this and efforts are being applied to establish best practice
in all areas. The O&M contract between TJSB and SEV places
significant responsibility for meeting reliability, availability
and efficiency targets on TJSB. These targets are being met and exceeded
through the efforts of the TJSB personnel and the standards they are
applying in their work.” In a similar undertaking, Innogy all conducted a high level
performance review at CUF Gebeng and Kertih on May 11-13, 2003. The
summary of the assessment states that “the standards applied by TJSB
for the management of operations and maintenance at both Kertih and
Gebeng CUF plants are generally in accordance with the world’s best
practice within the power generation industry. TJSB have drawn on
examples of best engineering practice, including Innogy’s Technical
Risk Management Documents to ensure safe, reliable operation of the
plant is maintained at a high level.” TJSB’s track record clearly demonstrates its
qualification as an efficient and cost effective O&M company. In the
plant that it operates and maintains, dramatic performance achievements
in terms of overall availability and efficiency levels are constantly
achieved that surpass its contractual obligations.
We strive to be one of the world's lowest cost producers of power, operating
safely, efficiently, profitably and with high regards to the local community
and environment.
Our track record clearly demonstrates our qualification as an efficient and
cost effective O&M company.
In the plant that we operate and maintain, dramatic performance achievements
in overall availability and efficiency levels are constantly achieved. Our
average performance parameters, for example, at Lumut Power Plant, indicate
the following:
To date, we never incurred liquidate damages (LDs) from our customer.
